Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Merel Hoedt vs Greta Greco Lucchina Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoedt vs Lucchina analysis and find out who is favored!
Merel Hoedt vs Greta Greco Lucchina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Lucchina
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 41.11% of points on their second serve, while Lucchina has won 40.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 57.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lucchina has won 54.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.59% and 42.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 52.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lucchina has saved 48.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 60.29% of matches played (W/L 41/ 27), with Lucchina winning 51.72% (W/L 15/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 105/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Lucchina has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19), where as Lucchina has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoedt winning 1 times and Lucchina being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Lucchina winning 1. The last match between Hoedt and Lucchina was at the W15 Casablanca, 27-07-2023, Second, Clay with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoedt and Lucchina have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hoedt winning 1 times and Lucchina 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoedt winning 0, and Lucchina 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.9 while Lucchina has played against players with an average rank of 111.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lucchina has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 51.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lucchina has converted 49.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
524
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
55% (162-133)
Career Total W/L
42% (16-22)
57% (16-12)
YTD W/L
46% (6-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Greta Greco Lucchina |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:24:0 | 2:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (60/82) | 71% (62/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (39/60) | 50% (31/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (7/22) | 40% (10/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 83% (5/6) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (46/87) | 44% (36/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Merel Hoedt
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
62 of
87)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Greta Greco Lucchina |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (16/12) | 46% (6/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (37/25) | 47% (15/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (311/261) | 47% (143/159) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.64 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 179 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:6 | 1:30:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.75 | 156 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1186/1799) | 62% (445/718) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (730/1186) | 53% (238/445) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (252/613) | 41% (111/273) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (140/271) | 49% (48/97) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (943/1930) | 48% (358/751) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (16/28) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anna Klasen
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
18
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tilde Stromquist
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Greta Greco Lucchina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Toma
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
50%
(
51 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuliana Lizarazo
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Greta Greco Lucchina
Player
Monique Barry
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greta Greco Lucchina
Player
Zala Vnuk
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
33%
(
17 of
52)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
13
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Greta Greco Lucchina
Player
Mariya Kostyuk
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
0
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arianna Zucchini
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hoedt Vs Lucchina Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hoedt are available here and Lucchina photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
